In the old days, (lets say 8 years ago)... most hardware didn't work on linux except with a LOT of work. In those days, stuff used to "just work" on windows. However, these days, things don't "just work" on windows... You need to install drivers (back then windows had about a list of 100 vendors per device, and had a something that should work with your hardware)... These days, you need to download a driver from the internet (which you may had to do then too - but then it was 1mb), and they come pricy when it comes to bandwidth. 45mb for a driver? You must be f#%king kidding me... Wait... you have a hardware abstraction layer you have to connect to... how hard can it be? 45mb?!!! The *whole* linux kernel is less than that (I believe... I think it's 27mb).
I'll be just naming the product I have in mind here... HP OfficeJet 4255 all-in-one. I think it's a shame that driver sizes has increased as much as they did. I don't know whether to blame windows or the companies, but the bottom line is: linux does it with much less bandwitdh, and probably much less effort.
The fact is just that linux is getting with the hardware curve, and windows is almost falling behind it. (And the vendors creates the drivers themselves!)
A vista driver 163mb (same product)... That's 3/8 of my cap of a month.
Sunday, December 28, 2008
Linux vs Windows (the old days, and now)
Labels:
Hewlett Packard,
linux,
open source,
operating systems,
tech,
windows
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
AND... Windows Vista simply "doesn't run" a lot of stuff that used to "just run"...
I must try and do the ubuntu thing soon.
Post a Comment